Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, Test Moderator
Non Member
99
Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:44 am
Club Member
858
Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:57 pm
Cheshire
Non Member
99
Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:44 am
Non Member
99
Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:44 am
Non Member
10431
Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am
Derbyshire
Non Member
10431
Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am
Derbyshire
Club Member
858
Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:57 pm
Cheshire
clee wrote:Quick google for a pic ....
Non Member
5602
Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:33 pm
Fleet, Hampshire
Club Member
858
Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:57 pm
Cheshire
Non Member
99
Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:44 am
Non Member
10431
Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am
Derbyshire
Club Member
858
Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:57 pm
Cheshire
dallarax19 wrote:4) Most of the parts are new
a) Upper control arms with ball joints
b) Lower control arm ball joints
c) Lower control arm bushing (inner pivot)
d) All radius rod bushings
e) Tie rods and ball joints
f) Shock absorbers and springs
dallarax19 wrote:Everything indicates to me I have an incorrect part and I am suspecting the upper control arm is too short. The height difference should not be enough to alter the geometry to the extent of the problems I see.
dallarax19 wrote:I think to start, the best action is to compare the upper control arm length to a known good part.
dallarax19 wrote:The next is to compare the length of the tie rod end relative to the steering rack clamp.
Non Member
99
Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:44 am
Club Member
858
Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:57 pm
Cheshire
dallarax19 wrote:
How do you have or find so many key photos???
dallarax19 wrote:I questioned the parts because I have had a bit of mix and match when I received the bits. The control arms had the same part number (I have a photo of that) but the ball stud tapers were different between the two arms. They may be fine but the fact they were not matching stays in the back of my mind as a concern.
Non Member
99
Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:44 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests